<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Art Monk a Hall of Famer?  Part One: Introduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and Analysis of the Washington Redskins and the NFL. Indepth game previews, statistical analysis and opinion pieces featuring the Redskins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Frandsen</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-22372</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Frandsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 07:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=115#comment-22372</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so draining to keep making this argument.  Look at http://www.coachmike.net/artmonk/artmonk.htm and see what you think.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so draining to keep making this argument.  Look at <a href="http://www.coachmike.net/artmonk/artmonk.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.coachmike.net/artmonk/artmonk.htm</a> and see what you think.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Art Monk a Hall of Famer? Part One: Introduction &#124; The Redskin Report</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-22146</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Art Monk a Hall of Famer? Part One: Introduction &#124; The Redskin Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=115#comment-22146</guid>
		<description>[...] This was originally published on January 28, 2006 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This was originally published on January 28, 2006 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron H</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-5820</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=115#comment-5820</guid>
		<description>Monk is a great player who deserves to be enshrined in the HOF.  Here is a note I sent to Peter King recently for next year&#039;s ballot --

Topic:  Art Monk and Cris Carter

Both men deserve to be in the Hall of Fame.  Thank you for finally seeing the light re Monk (it takes integrity to seek new info and admit being wrong - although shame on you for taking so long).  I write to point out how Cris Carter actually lends support to Art Monk&#039;s candidacy.

One of the (silly) criticisms about Monk was that although he was great, for many years he was not the best receiver on his own team.  Cris Carter, similarly, had to share the spotlight with better receivers in Minnesota.  At the start, Anthony Carter  was the most dangerous receiver on the Vikings.  At the end, Randy Moss was the guy other teams worried most about.  No one would argue this detracts from Cris&#039; legacy or Hall of Fame worthiness.

Art Monk shared the spotlight with pro-bowler Charlie Brown early (Monk was the better all-around receiver, Brown the dangerous deep threat) and later with Gary Clark (a guy whose stats for 5-6 years were close to Jerry Rice during his prime).  But Monk helped make Brown and Clark the threats they were and was the key posession receiver, blocker, mentor and all-around core guy that made Gibbs&#039; good teams great.  4 superbowls and 3 Lombardi trophies prove it.

I would note that Marvin Harrison continuing his career with a now superior Reggie Wayne is no shame.  In basketball, David Robinson will likely be a Hall of Famer, although Tim Duncan was the dominant big man in the years when Robinson won his NBA championships.  The list goes on.

The point is that Monk and Carter are extremely similar receivers in ability, size and character  and had a lot in common in their careers.  If Carter played a decade earlier on Gibbs&#039; teams with Brown and Clark and with Joe Gibbs asking him to block and play utility roles at times for the good of the team, he would probably have had a career stat-line like Monk and a few less pro bowls.  Had Monk played a decade later in Minnesota&#039;s in-a-dome, pass-heavy offense, he probably would have had the extra catches, pro bowls and TDs that Carter had.

It pains me to see a guy like Monk stuck on the outside waiting for his Hall of Fame day.  It pains me more because he is too classy to complain and his coaches and team-mates are too classy to campaign agressively for him.  And, my god, what a repulsive message to football fans and young men everywhere seeking role-models for you voters to elect Michael Irvin to the Hall before Monk.  A true disgrace for the HOF voters and NFL in every way.

Now that you have joined the good side of the force, I hope this perspective helps.  Let&#039;s elect both Monk and Carter on the next ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monk is a great player who deserves to be enshrined in the HOF.  Here is a note I sent to Peter King recently for next year&#8217;s ballot &#8211;</p>
<p>Topic:  Art Monk and Cris Carter</p>
<p>Both men deserve to be in the Hall of Fame.  Thank you for finally seeing the light re Monk (it takes integrity to seek new info and admit being wrong &#8211; although shame on you for taking so long).  I write to point out how Cris Carter actually lends support to Art Monk&#8217;s candidacy.</p>
<p>One of the (silly) criticisms about Monk was that although he was great, for many years he was not the best receiver on his own team.  Cris Carter, similarly, had to share the spotlight with better receivers in Minnesota.  At the start, Anthony Carter  was the most dangerous receiver on the Vikings.  At the end, Randy Moss was the guy other teams worried most about.  No one would argue this detracts from Cris&#8217; legacy or Hall of Fame worthiness.</p>
<p>Art Monk shared the spotlight with pro-bowler Charlie Brown early (Monk was the better all-around receiver, Brown the dangerous deep threat) and later with Gary Clark (a guy whose stats for 5-6 years were close to Jerry Rice during his prime).  But Monk helped make Brown and Clark the threats they were and was the key posession receiver, blocker, mentor and all-around core guy that made Gibbs&#8217; good teams great.  4 superbowls and 3 Lombardi trophies prove it.</p>
<p>I would note that Marvin Harrison continuing his career with a now superior Reggie Wayne is no shame.  In basketball, David Robinson will likely be a Hall of Famer, although Tim Duncan was the dominant big man in the years when Robinson won his NBA championships.  The list goes on.</p>
<p>The point is that Monk and Carter are extremely similar receivers in ability, size and character  and had a lot in common in their careers.  If Carter played a decade earlier on Gibbs&#8217; teams with Brown and Clark and with Joe Gibbs asking him to block and play utility roles at times for the good of the team, he would probably have had a career stat-line like Monk and a few less pro bowls.  Had Monk played a decade later in Minnesota&#8217;s in-a-dome, pass-heavy offense, he probably would have had the extra catches, pro bowls and TDs that Carter had.</p>
<p>It pains me to see a guy like Monk stuck on the outside waiting for his Hall of Fame day.  It pains me more because he is too classy to complain and his coaches and team-mates are too classy to campaign agressively for him.  And, my god, what a repulsive message to football fans and young men everywhere seeking role-models for you voters to elect Michael Irvin to the Hall before Monk.  A true disgrace for the HOF voters and NFL in every way.</p>
<p>Now that you have joined the good side of the force, I hope this perspective helps.  Let&#8217;s elect both Monk and Carter on the next ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Redskins Round-up &#124; The Redskin Report</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-5391</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Redskins Round-up &#124; The Redskin Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=115#comment-5391</guid>
		<description>[...] Art Monk and Russ Grimm were among the finalists for this year&#8217;s NFL Hall of Fame nominees. I will be updated last year&#8217;s Art Monk series as we get closer to the vote (you can read it here in the meantime) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Art Monk and Russ Grimm were among the finalists for this year&#8217;s NFL Hall of Fame nominees. I will be updated last year&#8217;s Art Monk series as we get closer to the vote (you can read it here in the meantime) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Are Pigs Flying? Peter King to support Art Monk &#124; The Redskin Report</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-1880</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Are Pigs Flying? Peter King to support Art Monk &#124; The Redskin Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=115#comment-1880</guid>
		<description>[...] In a huge change of heart, Peter King is saying he will vote for Art Monk to get into the Hall of Fame this year. King has always been the leader of the anti-Monk movement along with his SI cohort Dr. Z. While I&#8217;d love to take the credit and say that King must&#8217;ve read the four part series we did here, it was actually a discussion with Joe Gibbs that turned the tide. Gibbs pointed out that besides the numbers, Monk was superb blocker and a leader on a team that won multiple championships. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a huge change of heart, Peter King is saying he will vote for Art Monk to get into the Hall of Fame this year. King has always been the leader of the anti-Monk movement along with his SI cohort Dr. Z. While I&#8217;d love to take the credit and say that King must&#8217;ve read the four part series we did here, it was actually a discussion with Joe Gibbs that turned the tide. Gibbs pointed out that besides the numbers, Monk was superb blocker and a leader on a team that won multiple championships. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Redskin Report &#187; Is Art Monk a Hall of Famer? Part Four - Playoffs and The Reception Record - Washington Redskins News, Opinion and Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>The Redskin Report &#187; Is Art Monk a Hall of Famer? Part Four - Playoffs and The Reception Record - Washington Redskins News, Opinion and Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=115#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] PART ONE PART TWO PART THREE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PART ONE PART TWO PART THREE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Redskin Report &#187; Is Art Monk a Hall of Famer? Part Three - Career Peaks - Washington Redskins News, Opinion and Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>The Redskin Report &#187; Is Art Monk a Hall of Famer? Part Three - Career Peaks - Washington Redskins News, Opinion and Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=115#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] PART ONE PART TWO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PART ONE PART TWO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Redskin Report &#187; Is Art Monk a Hall of Famer? Part Two - Career Numbers - Washington Redskins News, Opinion and Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/28/is-art-monk-a-hall-of-famer-part-one-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>The Redskin Report &#187; Is Art Monk a Hall of Famer? Part Two - Career Numbers - Washington Redskins News, Opinion and Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=115#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] CLICK HERE FOR PART ONE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CLICK HERE FOR PART ONE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

