<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Completely Unbiased, Super Accurate NFC East Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and Analysis of the Washington Redskins and the NFL. Indepth game previews, statistical analysis and opinion pieces featuring the Redskins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; This Week&#8217;s Victim: Dallas Cowboys &#124; The Redskin Report</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; This Week&#8217;s Victim: Dallas Cowboys &#124; The Redskin Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>[...] Despite their fan&#8217;s insistence that all was well, their offensive line still stinks. You may have missed it a few weeks back when a Cowboy fan told me I was idiot and their offensive line was much improved. But after week one, I&#8217;m feeling pretty ok with my assessment. The Cowboys gave up two sacks against Jacksonville and looked pretty weak most of the game. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Despite their fan&#8217;s insistence that all was well, their offensive line still stinks. You may have missed it a few weeks back when a Cowboy fan told me I was idiot and their offensive line was much improved. But after week one, I&#8217;m feeling pretty ok with my assessment. The Cowboys gave up two sacks against Jacksonville and looked pretty weak most of the game. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Lee on the line problems, and feel the need to add this:

What team drafts or brings in so many new OL additions if they don&#039;t feel like they have significant issues on the OL?

While I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m willing to say 6-10 for Dallas like Lee, I&#039;d have to say that I would be VERY surprised if even Parcells (who, while I dislike, I have to admit is one heck of a coach) can bring this team to the Superbowl... and I think that might be why he signed TO.  He get&#039;s one last chance to grab the ring... and so (as the Washington Post put it) he and the Cowboys are &quot;All In&quot;... he retires after the season, and someone else picks through the wreckage if they fail, and starts the rebuilding process in earnest.  To be honest, they should be rebuilding NOW for a run a &#039;08 run, not trying to win it all in &#039;06.

I don&#039;t know the Redskins are going to be &quot;Super&quot; (especially after the preseason).... but I&#039;d be surprised if Dallas is higher in the standings at the end of the year.  My gut tells me Washington could be anywhere from 12-4 to 7-9, median of 10.  The Giants could be from 11-5 to 8-8, median of 9.5.  Dallas could be from 10-6 to 6-10 median of 8.5, same as the Eagles except the Eagles are median 8 (I&#039;d say Dallas is a bit more likely to finish higher than the Eagles, but the numbers at the edges are the same... just a different curve).  Median of course is the most probable area of number of wins... but since it&#039;s whole numbers only.... you get the picture.

At any rate, we&#039;ll see in 17 weeks or so... care to revisit this then, instead of huffing and puffing and calling names DC Dust?  I&#039;ll even accept an &quot;I told you so&quot; at that point.

I doubt you&#039;ll be here to RECEIVE one. As the theme song goes to start the TV show &quot;Monk&quot;,  &quot;I could be wrong.  But I don&#039;t think so.  It&#039;s a jungle out there.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Lee on the line problems, and feel the need to add this:</p>
<p>What team drafts or brings in so many new OL additions if they don&#8217;t feel like they have significant issues on the OL?</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m willing to say 6-10 for Dallas like Lee, I&#8217;d have to say that I would be VERY surprised if even Parcells (who, while I dislike, I have to admit is one heck of a coach) can bring this team to the Superbowl&#8230; and I think that might be why he signed TO.  He get&#8217;s one last chance to grab the ring&#8230; and so (as the Washington Post put it) he and the Cowboys are &#8220;All In&#8221;&#8230; he retires after the season, and someone else picks through the wreckage if they fail, and starts the rebuilding process in earnest.  To be honest, they should be rebuilding NOW for a run a &#8217;08 run, not trying to win it all in &#8217;06.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know the Redskins are going to be &#8220;Super&#8221; (especially after the preseason)&#8230;. but I&#8217;d be surprised if Dallas is higher in the standings at the end of the year.  My gut tells me Washington could be anywhere from 12-4 to 7-9, median of 10.  The Giants could be from 11-5 to 8-8, median of 9.5.  Dallas could be from 10-6 to 6-10 median of 8.5, same as the Eagles except the Eagles are median 8 (I&#8217;d say Dallas is a bit more likely to finish higher than the Eagles, but the numbers at the edges are the same&#8230; just a different curve).  Median of course is the most probable area of number of wins&#8230; but since it&#8217;s whole numbers only&#8230;. you get the picture.</p>
<p>At any rate, we&#8217;ll see in 17 weeks or so&#8230; care to revisit this then, instead of huffing and puffing and calling names DC Dust?  I&#8217;ll even accept an &#8220;I told you so&#8221; at that point.</p>
<p>I doubt you&#8217;ll be here to RECEIVE one. As the theme song goes to start the TV show &#8220;Monk&#8221;,  &#8220;I could be wrong.  But I don&#8217;t think so.  It&#8217;s a jungle out there.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>mk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/#comment-1025</guid>
		<description>LOL!  I can&#039;t believe I missed this yesterday... Looks like cowboys fans are a bit sensitive.  Injuries aside, the cowboyâ€™s line is the reason for a non existent running gameâ€¦ coupled with the fact that last year the Texans were the only team to allow more sacks than the cowboys.  And, I&#039;m sure the absence of Larry Allen won&#039;t hurt either.  In fact, the more I think about it, I bet stupid people stop you on the street and say &quot;God Dam&#039;n you&#039;re stupid!&quot; ... because if you stopped a 1/2 second and thought about it, you could answer your own question.  What kind of offensive line allows 1 player to get 4 sacks in one game?  Answer:  A bad offensive line.  Injuries aside and uninspiring free agent moves won&#039;t fix what&#039;s broke.  I just can&#039;t wait until the self proclaimed beacon of NFC EAST knowledge, looks in the mirror and realizes his beloved, over hyped team, is a last place disappointment in the NFC East... next stop TO&#039;s melt downs, and Parcells retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  I can&#8217;t believe I missed this yesterday&#8230; Looks like cowboys fans are a bit sensitive.  Injuries aside, the cowboyâ€™s line is the reason for a non existent running gameâ€¦ coupled with the fact that last year the Texans were the only team to allow more sacks than the cowboys.  And, I&#8217;m sure the absence of Larry Allen won&#8217;t hurt either.  In fact, the more I think about it, I bet stupid people stop you on the street and say &#8220;God Dam&#8217;n you&#8217;re stupid!&#8221; &#8230; because if you stopped a 1/2 second and thought about it, you could answer your own question.  What kind of offensive line allows 1 player to get 4 sacks in one game?  Answer:  A bad offensive line.  Injuries aside and uninspiring free agent moves won&#8217;t fix what&#8217;s broke.  I just can&#8217;t wait until the self proclaimed beacon of NFC EAST knowledge, looks in the mirror and realizes his beloved, over hyped team, is a last place disappointment in the NFC East&#8230; next stop TO&#8217;s melt downs, and Parcells retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>&#039;Experienced and solid&#039; Rob Petiti?   The guy was a 6th round draft pick last year and he was about as below average as you can get in a starting offensive line.  As for all these new additions, you&#039;ll have to forgive me for not getting excited about a team starting a guy who couldn&#039;t seal up a full time starting job with Detroit and a guy who was released by the Bears after one game last year.  

And hey, leave Pluto out of this.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Experienced and solid&#8217; Rob Petiti?   The guy was a 6th round draft pick last year and he was about as below average as you can get in a starting offensive line.  As for all these new additions, you&#8217;ll have to forgive me for not getting excited about a team starting a guy who couldn&#8217;t seal up a full time starting job with Detroit and a guy who was released by the Bears after one game last year.  </p>
<p>And hey, leave Pluto out of this.  <img src='http://www.theredskinreport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Dust 26</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Dust 26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/09/05/the-completely-unbiased-super-accurate-nfc-east-preview/#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>re: What kind of offensive line allows Phillip Daniels to get four sacks in a game?  Answer me this:  Who was Daniels lining up against that game?  Do you see that player on the Cowboys roster today?  Do you believe Flozell Adams&#039; absence may have had anything to do with it?  Do you think perhaps that Dallas&#039; new OL additions (Kosier, Fabini, Colombo, McQuistan, Procter) beating out an unspectacular, but experienced and solid, Petiti for a roster spot is at all indicative?  Do you even know who Colombo is?  Your so-called reporting has all indications of spending a &quot;Big Brother All-Stars&quot; commercial-break researching the Redskins formidable NFC East opponents, and all the value of a &quot;Save Pluto Now!&quot; t-shirt.  Highly irresponsible and downright offensive reporting to thousands of fans who actually follow the division.  I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a good Tiger Woods story you can go chase down.  Leave the NFL reporting to those who actually care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: What kind of offensive line allows Phillip Daniels to get four sacks in a game?  Answer me this:  Who was Daniels lining up against that game?  Do you see that player on the Cowboys roster today?  Do you believe Flozell Adams&#8217; absence may have had anything to do with it?  Do you think perhaps that Dallas&#8217; new OL additions (Kosier, Fabini, Colombo, McQuistan, Procter) beating out an unspectacular, but experienced and solid, Petiti for a roster spot is at all indicative?  Do you even know who Colombo is?  Your so-called reporting has all indications of spending a &#8220;Big Brother All-Stars&#8221; commercial-break researching the Redskins formidable NFC East opponents, and all the value of a &#8220;Save Pluto Now!&#8221; t-shirt.  Highly irresponsible and downright offensive reporting to thousands of fans who actually follow the division.  I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a good Tiger Woods story you can go chase down.  Leave the NFL reporting to those who actually care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

