<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Redskins 2008 Schedule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theredskinreport.com/2008/04/15/washington-redskins-2008-schedule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2008/04/15/washington-redskins-2008-schedule/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and Analysis of the Washington Redskins and the NFL. Indepth game previews, statistical analysis and opinion pieces featuring the Redskins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2008/04/15/washington-redskins-2008-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-26607</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=864#comment-26607</guid>
		<description>In some ways I agree Bill.  I&#039;ve probably become a bit too used to big December runs and think they happen more often than they really do.  

I will say if we go 0-4 in November with two home divisional games, we&#039;re toast.  Zorn&#039;s going to have to prove himself in this division games, if we go 1-5 or 0-6 against the NFC East, we&#039;ll be worrying about our draft pick much earlier next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some ways I agree Bill.  I&#8217;ve probably become a bit too used to big December runs and think they happen more often than they really do.  </p>
<p>I will say if we go 0-4 in November with two home divisional games, we&#8217;re toast.  Zorn&#8217;s going to have to prove himself in this division games, if we go 1-5 or 0-6 against the NFC East, we&#8217;ll be worrying about our draft pick much earlier next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2008/04/15/washington-redskins-2008-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-26582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=864#comment-26582</guid>
		<description>Lee, sorry, but I have to disagree with a some of the analysis; it&#039;s much better to have off games between the hard games (though starting the season with the hard games may help; we&#039;re less likely to have injuries that will effect whether or not we can field a workable team).  I&#039;d particularly liked to have had at least a few of the more difficult games have a breather between them; it&#039;s going to be disappointing if we are already out of contention by week 9 or 10 because the schedule was so heavily front loaded, even if we do have a lighter schedule.

Dallas after the Bye is a nice touch, but I would have hoped that we wouldn&#039;t have three weeks of tough games a coast-to-coast trip in the middle (and the first is a NIGHT game!); that&#039;s artificially going to make the stretch even more difficult.  Additionally, having almost all of the tough games on the road (the toughest game non-NFC East at home is Pittsburgh; the next is New Orleans) hurts, as well.  I&#039;d much rather play a cream puff on the road, and a tough team at home.

That said, there are SOME favors in there.  But with a schedule where we may be realistically projected to potentially go 0-4 in November is not a good schedule.  On the other hand, it is the schedule we&#039;ve seen the last two play off teams.... November Swoon, December Streak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee, sorry, but I have to disagree with a some of the analysis; it&#8217;s much better to have off games between the hard games (though starting the season with the hard games may help; we&#8217;re less likely to have injuries that will effect whether or not we can field a workable team).  I&#8217;d particularly liked to have had at least a few of the more difficult games have a breather between them; it&#8217;s going to be disappointing if we are already out of contention by week 9 or 10 because the schedule was so heavily front loaded, even if we do have a lighter schedule.</p>
<p>Dallas after the Bye is a nice touch, but I would have hoped that we wouldn&#8217;t have three weeks of tough games a coast-to-coast trip in the middle (and the first is a NIGHT game!); that&#8217;s artificially going to make the stretch even more difficult.  Additionally, having almost all of the tough games on the road (the toughest game non-NFC East at home is Pittsburgh; the next is New Orleans) hurts, as well.  I&#8217;d much rather play a cream puff on the road, and a tough team at home.</p>
<p>That said, there are SOME favors in there.  But with a schedule where we may be realistically projected to potentially go 0-4 in November is not a good schedule.  On the other hand, it is the schedule we&#8217;ve seen the last two play off teams&#8230;. November Swoon, December Streak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

