<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Redskin Report &#187; 2005-06 Season Archives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theredskinreport.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts and Analysis of the Washington Redskins and the NFL. Indepth game previews, statistical analysis and opinion pieces featuring the Redskins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 21:55:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>End of the Line</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/14/end-of-the-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/14/end-of-the-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 03:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The run has ended. The Redskins just didn&#8217;t have enough to defeat the Seahawks today. Congrats to Seattle, they were the better team. And thank you to the Redskins for a competitive and fun season. It was good to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/SEA11901150036.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/SEA11901150036.jpg" /></a><br />
The run has ended.  The Redskins just didn&#8217;t have enough to defeat the Seahawks today.  Congrats to Seattle, they were the better team.   And thank you to the Redskins for a competitive and fun season.   It was good to be in the playoffs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be back on Monday with look at this years team and more.</p>
<p>Hail to the Redskins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/14/end-of-the-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Weeks Victim: The Seattle Seahawks</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/13/this-weeks-victim-the-seattle-seahawks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/13/this-weeks-victim-the-seattle-seahawks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should know the drill by now. The Redskins havenâ€™t lost since I started doing this, so it continues. Here is why the Redskins win against Seattle this week: Here are the rushing yards against Seattle by all the above [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should know the drill by now.  The Redskins havenâ€™t lost since I started doing this, so it continues.   Here is why the Redskins win against Seattle this week:</p>
<ul>
<li>Here are the rushing yards against Seattle by all the above average running teams theyâ€™ve played.  See if you notice a trend (listed in order of the games played):</li>
</ul>
<p>1. Jacksonville     119 yards<br />
2. Atlanta     115 yards<br />
3. Washington     141 yards<br />
4. Dallas     164 yards<br />
5. NY Giants      166 yards</p>
<ul>
<li>Strength of Schedule: Washington .539; Seattle .430</li>
<li>Strength of Victory: Washington .500; Seattle .404</li>
<li>Rested or Rusty?  Seattle hasnâ€™t played a game with any meaning since they played the Indianapolis B team on December 24th.  Theyâ€™ve played one good, full strength team (NY Giants) since November 1.</li>
<li>Washington hasnâ€™t lost to Seattle since 1998 (3-0)</li>
<li>Seattle hasnâ€™t won a playoff game since 1984</li>
<li>Big bad Shaun Alexander last year in the playoffs against the ultra menacing (yes that is sarcasm) St. Louis defense: 15 carries, 40 yards, and 2.7 yards per carry.</li>
<li>Big Bad Shaun Alexander in 2003 in the playoffs against the super stingy Green Bay defense: 20 carries, 45 yards, 2.3 yards per carry</li>
<li>Seattle coach Mike Holmgren has lost 5 straight playoff games.</li>
<li>Joe Gibbs playoff record is 17-5.</li>
<li>Matt Hasselbeck has never beaten Washington or won a playoff game.</li>
<li>Itâ€™s supposed to rain, so they wonâ€™t be able to tell when Sean Taylor spits.</li>
<li>Seattle is the official town of choking teams: The 116 win 2001 Mariners not making the World Series, the top seeded Supersonics getting knocked out by the 8th seeded Denver Nuggets in 1994.  Its time to add the Seahawks to the list.</li>
</ul>
<p>Thatâ€™s a good enough list for today.  Enjoy the game, Go Skins.</p>
<p>In the Post:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011302031.html">Griffin bio</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011300761.html">Taylor trial delayed</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011301945.html">Fans wear shirts</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011301986.html">Wilbon likes Seattle</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011302080.html">Everyone likes the Skins</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011301947.html">Redskins media blitz</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011301863.html">More name nonsense</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011302030.html">Redskins = Ratings</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011301930.html">Hasselback jazz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/13/this-weeks-victim-the-seattle-seahawks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divisional Playoff Preview: Special Teams and Game Picks</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/12/divisional-playoff-preview-special-teams-and-game-picks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/12/divisional-playoff-preview-special-teams-and-game-picks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you compare the offenses and defenses of the Washington Redskins and Seattle Seahawks, youâ€™d come to the conclusion that Washington has the better defense, while Seattle is better offensively. That would leave special teams as the tiebreaker. Unfortunately it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you compare the offenses and defenses of the Washington Redskins and Seattle Seahawks, youâ€™d come to the conclusion that Washington has the better defense, while Seattle is better offensively.  That would leave special teams as the tiebreaker.  Unfortunately it is pretty well a draw here too.  Each team has its relative strengths and weaknesses, and when added all together, the Redskins may have a slight edge by the slimmest of margins.</p>
<p>Redskins Special Teams<br />
K: John Hall 12-14 85.7%<br />
P: Derrick Frost 40.4 Avg., 36.7 Net<br />
PR: Antonio Brown 13-63, 4.8 avg.<br />
KR: Ladell Betts 24-621, 25.9 avg., 1 TD<br />
Antonio Brown 19-439, 23.1 avg., 1 TD<br />
Kickoff Coverage: 72-1503, 20.9 avg., 0 TD, 6th in league<br />
Punt Coverage: 40-189, 4.7 avg., 0 TD, 2nd in league</p>
<p>Joe Gibbs has always put a focus on special teams. And the Redskinsâ€™ special teams, which not long ago were a terrible unit, are now a strong part of the club. They are led by the kickoff return team. Both Ladell Betts and Antonio Brown had return touchdowns. Betts will get the call as the main return man once again this week.  He is more consistent on his returns and with the Redskins offense, every extra yard is needed. Brown will handle the punt return duties. He has yet to break one since his return, but with his speed, it could happen at any time. Kicker John Hall hasnâ€™t been needed much, but has done well when called upon. His kickoffs are a bit below average. Punter Derrick Frost has improved as the season has gone on, but he does have some shanks punts every now and again.</p>
<p>One additional note, Brown did muff a punt last week (although he did recover his own fumble).  It wouldnâ€™t be a big surprise if Santana Moss is put back to return a punt or two this week.</p>
<p>Seahawks Special Teams<br />
K: Josh Brown 18-25, 72%<br />
P: Tom Rouen 41.6 avg., 35.0 net<br />
PR: Jimmy Williams 24-139, 5.8 avg.<br />
KR: Josh Scobey 59-1326, 22.5 avg.<br />
Kickoff Coverage: 83-1802, 21.7 avg., 1 TD, 16th in the league<br />
Punt Coverage: 41-343, 8.4 avg., 0 TD, 18th in the league</p>
<p>Josh Brown followed up a tremendous 2004, with a decent 2005.  His accuracy percentage dropped by 20% this year, although when youâ€™re coming off a season of hitting 92% of your kicks, a drop is to be expected.   Brown has one of the strongest kicking legs in the NFL, and hit from 55 yards this year.  Strangely for a kicker who can hit long field goals, he only had 4 touchbacks this year.  The punting duties fall to the cagey Tom Rouen.  The 13 year vet had another good season, average over 41 yards per kick.</p>
<p>The return game has been rather lackluster this season.  Scobey is a good young player, but hasnâ€™t been able to break a return yet this season.  The punt return men have had unremarkable years.  Peter Warrick has also been used at times to return punts.  The coverage units rank in the middle of the NFL.  They allowed one touchdown this season, a kickoff return in a game against St. Louis.</p>
<p><strong>Game Pick:</strong></p>
<p>Being the homer that I am, Iâ€™m picking the Redskins.  As for why, I have a few reasons: 1) Coaching â€“ Holmgren is a decent coach, but heâ€™s not in Gibbs league.  In a big game, I trust Gibbs to have the team ready to go.<br />
2) Human Nature: For the past 3 week, the Seahawks having been hearing over and over how they are the best team in the NFC.  This week, everyone is picking a romp over the Skins.  If the Seahawks just show up and expect a victory, the Redskins will punch them in the mouth.<br />
3) Intensity: The Skins have been in playoff mode for 6 straight games now.  The Seahawks havenâ€™t played in a big game since that Giants game in late November.  Can the Seahawks flip a switch and be at the Redskins level of intensity from kickoff?</p>
<p>I have a few more, but I need to save something to write about before the game.  So Iâ€™m taking the Skins in a tight one.</p>
<p>Redskins 20 Seahawks 17</p>
<p><strong>The Other Games:</strong></p>
<p>Denver 24 New England 17<br />
The Broncos are the better team period if you analyze the game.  Of course the easy way out is to say the Pats will win simply because they are the Patriots.  Unless Plummer flames out, it isnâ€™t going to happen.</p>
<p>Indianapolis 35 Pittsburgh 14<br />
This wonâ€™t be close.  Pittsburgh needs to chew up clock to have a chance, and Willie Parker isnâ€™t that type of back.</p>
<p>Chicago 17 Carolina 14<br />
In case no one noticed, the Giants were fading down the stretch.  Donâ€™t over estimate the Panthers despite that win.  They are still a flawed team.  Iâ€™d be amazed if Foster gets over 50 yards this week.</p>
<p><em>In the Post:</em><br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/12/AR2006011202259.html">Springs, Daniels return to Seattle</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/12/AR2006011202371.html">Holmgren, Alexander uneasy truce</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/12/AR2006011202258.html">Spitgate</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/12/AR2006011202372.html">Seattle waits</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/12/AR2006011201940.html">Redskins songs</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/12/AR2006011202171.html">Gambling on the Skins</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/12/AR2006011202135.html">Polite yet hostile fans</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/12/divisional-playoff-preview-special-teams-and-game-picks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divisional Playoff Preview: Redskins Offense vs Seahawks Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/11/divisional-playoff-preview-redskins-offense-vs-seahawks-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/11/divisional-playoff-preview-redskins-offense-vs-seahawks-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Redskin offense looked awful last week. There are no excuses or simple reasons to explain why, they were just horrible. Last week aside, they have been a decent unit for most of the season. The running attack is one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Redskin offense looked awful last week.  There are no excuses or simple reasons to explain why, they were just horrible.  Last week aside, they have been a decent unit for most of the season.  The running attack is one of the best in the league, and the Brunell to Moss combination has terrorized opposing defenses all year long.  While the Redskins look for a rebound, itâ€™s hard to know what to expect from the Seahawks defense.  Statistically, they show up as an average unit; however most media types will tell you theyâ€™ve improved as the year has progressed.  How much of that can be attributed to a weak schedule is unknown, however you donâ€™t win thirteen games with a bad defense.  By the time Saturday comes along, the Seahawks wonâ€™t have played a meaningful game in 21 days.  Will they be rested or rusty come game time?  We will soon see.</p>
<p><strong>Expected Starters</strong><br />
<u>Washington Offense</u><br />
QB: Mark Brunell<br />
RB: Clinton Portis<br />
HB: Chris Cooley<br />
WR: Santana Moss<br />
WR: *James Thrash<br />
TE: Robert Royal<br />
OL: C. Samuels, D. Dockery, C. Rabach, R. Brown, J. Jansen*James Thrash is listed as questionable and may not play; if he doesnâ€™t Taylor Jacobs will start.</p>
<p><u>Seattle Defense</u><br />
DE: Bryce Fisher<br />
DT: Chuck Darby<br />
DT: Marcus Tubbs<br />
DE: Grant Wistrom<br />
OLB: Leroy Hill<br />
MLB: Lofa Tatupu<br />
ROLB: **D.D. Lewis<br />
LCB: Andre Dyson<br />
RCB: Marucs Trufant<br />
SS: Michael Boulware<br />
FS: Marquand Manuel**D.D. Lewis is listed as questionable, but is expected to play; if he doesnâ€™t Isaiah Kacyvenski will start,</p>
<p><strong>Passing Game:</strong><br />
<em>Washington</em>:<br />
Mark Brunell 262-454, 57.7%, 23 TD, 10 INT<br />
Santana Moss 84-1483, 9 TD<br />
Chris Cooley 71-774, 7 TD</p>
<p>For most readers of this site, there isnâ€™t really a lot to say.  The passing game revolves around three players: Mark Brunell, Santana Moss and Chris Cooley.  Brunell and Cooley are the main concerns for most fans.  Brunell hasnâ€™t played well since taking a low hit in the Giants game.  Although his mobility seemed to be better last week, he still wasnâ€™t making many throws.  Cooley has all but disappeared over the last two weeks, totaling 4 catches for 20 yards.  The Redskins need these two to pick up their games if they hope to get the offense back rolling.  Santana Moss will once again be the most explosive player on either team.  Even last week while the offense struggled, Moss was twice behind the defense and just missed on long completions.  That is really the whole passing game.  Portis makes a catch or two per week.  Betts is a decent receiver.  Royal and Sellers usually get a few balls per game as well.</p>
<p><em>Seattle:</em><br />
Bryce Fisher 9 sacks<br />
Rocky Bernard 8.5 sacks<br />
Michael Boulware 2 sacks, 4 interceptions<br />
Lofa Tatupu 4 sacks, 3 interceptions</p>
<p>Iâ€™ll be honest with you; I havenâ€™t seen many Seahawks games this season.  Besides the Redskins game, I caught some of their game with Dallas and some of the Giants game, but thatâ€™s it.  When grading offensive players, you can look at numbers and get a lot of the story; defensively itâ€™s a different story.  Iâ€™m sure if I miss something, or there is something to add, our friendly Seahawk visitors will correct me in the comments section below.</p>
<p>Seattle led the NFL in sacks this year.  That is a tremendous feat considering they do not have any star pass rushers in their lineup.  Among the lineman, defensive end Bryce Fisher and backup defensive tackle Rocky Bernard are the top sack artists.  Grant Wistrom is still a hard working player, but his best days at getting to the quarterback are behind him.  The secondary is in the bottom half in terms of passing yards allowed, however some of that can be attributed to the Seahawks winning most of their games and forcing teams to be one dimensional.  While Michael Boulware and Marcus Trufant are the biggest names in the secondary, the Redskins must be concerned with nickel back Jordan Babineaux who finished with 4 interceptions.  Also note that Seattleâ€™s numbers are much worse than Tampa Bayâ€™s at covering top receivers and tight ends, which should help the Redskins.</p>
<p><em>Seahawks Pass Defense by the Numbers</em>:<br />
Vs Number 1 Receivers: Ranked 19th<br />
Vs Number 2 Receivers: Ranked 17th<br />
Vs Other Receivers: Ranked 23rd<br />
Vs Tight Ends: Ranked 21st<br />
Vs Running Backs: Ranked 10th<br />
<strong><br />
Run Game</strong><br />
<em>Washington:</em><br />
Clinton Portis 352-1516, 4.3ypc, 11 TD<br />
Ladell Betts 89-338, 3.8ypc, 1 TD<br />
Rock Cartwright 27-199, 7.4, 2 TD</p>
<p>All Redskins fans will hold their breath the 1st couple times Clinton Portis carries the ball.  The Redskins need a healthy Portis to lead the run game.  The team has said he suffered from shoulder stingers last week, and they expect him to fine this week.   Portis is a similar runner to the Seahawksâ€™ Shaun Alexander.  They are both tough runners with the ability to break the long one.  Ladell Betts and Rock Cartwright are solid backups and limit the drop-off when Portis comes out of the game.</p>
<p><em>Washington Run Game by the Numbers:</em><br />
Runs around Left End: 4.45ypc (10th)<br />
Runs behind Left Tackle: 4.27ypc (17th)<br />
Runs up the Middle: 4.38ypc (10th)<br />
Runs behind the Right Tackle: 4.00ypc (21st)<br />
Runs around Right End: 5.02ypc (3rd) <em /></p>
<p><em>Seattle: </em><br />
Lofa Tatupu 104 tackles<br />
Jordan Babineaux 74 tackles 1 forced fumble<br />
Michael Boulware 73 tackles 1 forced fumble</p>
<p>The Seahawks rush defense ranks 5th in league.  However, much like the pass defense rankings suffer due to winning so many games, the actual rush defense isnâ€™t as good as their ranking.  Playing Arizona twice a year would help any teamâ€™s rush defense numbers.  The Seahawks have only faced one top ten rushing team since October 2nd (NY Giants).  The Redskins will present a very tough challenge for the Seattle rush defense.   Lofa Tatupu is a rising star at middle linebacker.  He led the team in tackles by a long shot, and is strong in run coverage.   Safety Michael Boulware is very good against the run and makes a lot of plays for the defense.  If Portis is healthy, Iâ€™d look for him to break the 100 yard barrier for the 6th time in 7 games.  Note that Seattle is very good at stopping runs to the right, so look for the Redskins to favor runs to the left.</p>
<p><em>Seahawks Run Defense by the Numbers:</em><br />
Runs around Left End: 3.94ypc (15th)<br />
Runs behind Left Tackle: 3.93ypc (11th)<br />
Runs up the Middle: 3.64ypc (4th)<br />
Runs behind Right Tackle: 3.53ypc (4th)<br />
Runs around Right End: 2.40ypc (2nd)</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong><br />
The Redskins offense will need to score points this week.  Seattle is not a team that is going to make a ton of mistakes, so the Skins canâ€™t rely on the defense making game changing plays.  Establishing the run will be the key for the Redskins.  As mentioned previously, the Redskins will look to control the clock thus Brunell needs to get back to converting those 3rd and shorts.   When looking over both teams offenses, I expect turnovers to be at a premium.  Of late, both teams have been stingy with possession and Iâ€™d look for that to continue.  A time consuming scoring drive to open the game would go a long way to quieting the crowd at Qwest Field. <em /></p>
<p><em>Tomorrow: Special Teams, Intangibles and Game Picks</em></p>
<p><em>In Thursday&#8217;s Post:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/11/AR2006011102425.html">Seahawks defensive improvement</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/11/AR2006011102427.html">Gibbs Legacy Safe</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/11/AR2006011102178.html">Prioleau Grabs Opportunity</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/11/AR2006011102069.html">Lighter Side</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/11/divisional-playoff-preview-redskins-offense-vs-seahawks-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divisional Playoff Preview: Redskins Defense vs Seahawks Offense</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/10/divisional-playoff-preview-redskins-defense-vs-seahawks-offense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/10/divisional-playoff-preview-redskins-defense-vs-seahawks-offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shocking fact: The Seattle offense is good. They are built up the middle in terms of strength. The offensive line, quarterback and running backs are the top players on the unit. The receivers are a good crew, but nothing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shocking fact: The Seattle offense is good.  They are built up the middle in terms of strength.   The offensive line, quarterback and running backs are the top players on the unit.  The receivers are a good crew, but nothing to get excited about.  This is your key to the game: If Seattle scores above 24 points the Redskins will be in trouble (yes I know that is obvious, but we have Seattle fans reading here this week, so I have to dumb it down a bit for them).  The task of holding them down falls to a defense that is playing its best football of the season.  This will be a battle.</p>
<p><strong>Expected Starters</strong><br />
<u>Seattle Offense</u><br />
QB: Matt Hasselbeck<br />
RB: Shaun Alexander<br />
FB: Mack Strong<br />
WR: Darrell Jackson<br />
WR: Bobby Engram<br />
TE: Jerramy Stevens<br />
OL: Walter Jones, Steve Hutchinson, Robbie Tobeck, Chris Gray, Sean Locklear<br />
<u><br />
Washington Defense</u><br />
DE: Demetric Evans<br />
DT: Cornelius Griffin<br />
DT: Joe Salaveâ€™a<br />
DE: Phillip Daniels<br />
SLB: Marcus Washington<br />
MLB: Lemar Marshall<br />
WLB: LaVar Arrington<br />
LCB: Shawn Springs<br />
RCB: Carlos Rogers<br />
SS: Ryan Clark<br />
FS: Sean Taylor</p>
<p><strong>Passing Game:</strong><br />
<em>Seattle</em>:<br />
Matt Hasselbeck 294-449, 65.5%, 3459 yards,  24 TD, 9 INT, 98.2 QB Rating<br />
Bobby Engram 67-778, 11.6ypc, 3 TD<br />
Joe Jurevicius 55-694, 12.6ypc, 10 TD</p>
<p>Hasselbeck is a very accurate passer.  Heâ€™s matured over the years, and is now one of the better quarterbacks in the league.  The 2005 season has been a breakout year for Hasselback, as his QB rating has reached the 90s for the 1st time.  When you go through the Seattle schedule, you notice the lack of good teams.  But more specifically they havenâ€™t played a top ten pass defense since the 1st Washington game.</p>
<p>The receiving corps doesnâ€™t feature any superstars, but has great depth.  The Seahawks lack a true number 1 receiver but they have 3 reliable wideouts.  Darrell Jackson, who missed a lot of the season with injury, is the nominal number one guy.  He started out this season on fire, with two 100 yard games in the 1st three contests.  Since returning from the injury, heâ€™s only played in two games and has been ok.  Bobby Engram, has long been one of the best 3rd receivers in the league.  This year he was promoted to the starting line-up and has produced.  Engram is a possession receiver and not a big threat in the red zone.  Joe Jurevicius, came up big through all the injuries.  Though his numbers have dropped since Jackson returned, he is still a big threat to score.</p>
<p>Jerramay Stevens is a big (6â€™7) tight end, who also has had a career year in 2005.  Heâ€™s a decent threat, and is looked for quite a bit on 3rd downs.  DJ Hackett is the big play threat, but will be used sparingly with all the receivers being healthy.  They rarely throw to the running backs.</p>
<p>The offensive line does a good job pass blocking, and the Seahawks ranked amongst the league leaders in least sacks allowed.  The entire line is good at pass blocking and besides Osi Umenyioraâ€™s domination of Walter Jones in the Giants game, the line has played well.</p>
<p><em>Seahawks Passing Game by the Numbers</em>:<br />
Overall Ranking: 13th<br />
Schedule Adjustment Ranking: n/a</p>
<p><em>Washington:</em><br />
Phillip Daniels 8 sacks<br />
Marcus Washington 7.5 sacks, 1 interception<br />
Lemar Marshall 2 sacks, 4 interceptions<br />
Ryan Clark 0.5 sacks, 3 interceptions</p>
<p>If the Redskins are to get pressure on Hasselbeck it may have to come from up the middle.  Blitzing and getting to the QB can be tough in a west coast offense.  Phillip Daniels has a tough match-up, going up against all-world tackle Walter Jones.  Iâ€™d expect a similar approach as the Tampa Bay game, with the line trying to bat balls down.  Demetric Evans is a better pass rusher than Renaldo Wynn so the Redskins may gain a bit in terms of pass rush from that exchange.  The secondary is healthy and expected to be at full strength for the 1st time since Carlos Rogersâ€™ injury.  The Skins will have to avoid giving up the big plays and try to force a turnover or two.</p>
<p><em>Redskins Pass Defense by the Numbers</em>:<br />
Overall Ranking: 10th<br />
Schedule Adjustment Ranking: 7th<br />
Vs. #1 Receivers: Ranked 6th<br />
Vs. #2 Receivers: Ranked 16th<br />
Vs. Other Receivers: Ranked 13th<br />
Vs. Tight Ends: Ranked 7th<br />
Vs. Running Backs: Ranked 5th</p>
<p><strong>Run Game</strong><br />
<em>Seattle:</em><br />
Shaun Alexander 370-1880, 5.1ypc, 27 TD<br />
Maurice Morris 71-288, 4.1ypc, 1 TD<br />
Matt Hasselbeck 36-124, 3.4ypc, 1 TD</p>
<p>What more can be said about Shaun Alexander, your 2005 NFL MVP.  Heâ€™s had a career year, leading the league in rushing and setting a record for touchdowns.  He can break a long run, or power his way through a crowd.  The Redskins will need to continue their strong tackling and avoid the big play.  As Jon Jansen said on the official website, whichever team rushes for more yards will probably win this contest.  Oddly enough, despite all the accolades that Jones and Hutchinson get, the Seahawks are better at running to the right side.  Maurice Morris is a capable back up and Mack Strong is a quality fullback.</p>
<p><em>Seattle Run Game by the Numbers:</em><br />
Overall Ranking: 3rd<br />
Schedule Adjustment Ranking: 4th<br />
Runs around Left End: 4.21ypc (16th)<br />
Runs behind Left Tackle: 3.76ypc (24th)<br />
Runs up the Middle: 4.72ypc (2nd)<br />
Runs behind Right Tackle: 5.22ypc (2nd)<br />
Runs around Right End: 4.71ypc (7th)</p>
<p><em>Washington:</em><br />
Lemar Marshall 98 tackles; 2 forced fumbles<br />
Marcus Washington 93 tackles; 3 forced fumbles<br />
Sean Taylor 70 tackles; 2 forced fumbles</p>
<p>The battle of the game will be up front on running plays.  The Redskins have one of the best run stopping defensive lines, while the offensive line of the Seahawks is top notch.  If you look at the numbers, in terms of the directions of runs, the strengths of both teams match up.  The Skins are good at defending out runs to the right and up the middle and the Hawks are good at running in the same direction.  It will be a battle.</p>
<p><em>Redskins Run Defense by the Numbers:</em><br />
Overall Ranking: 13th<br />
Schedule Adjustment Ranking: 5th<br />
Runs around Left End: 4.39ypc (21st)<br />
Runs behind Left Tackle: 3.94ypc (12th)<br />
Runs up the Middle: 3.72ypc (7th)<br />
Runs behind Right Tackle: 4.19ypc (19th)<br />
Runs around Right End: 3.12ypc (6th)</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>As mentioned yesterday, the key to the game will probably be keeping the Seattle offense off the field.  Unfortunately itâ€™s doubtful that the Redskins will control the ball for all 60 minutes, so the defense will have to make plays.  This will be a war.  The Seattle offense is 2nd in the league and the Redskins defense is playing great.  When looking at the units on paper, itâ€™s hard to say who has the edge.  Luckily the games are decided on the field, and it should be a treat to watch on Saturday.</p>
<p>Tomorrow: Redskins Offense vs. Seattle Defense</p>
<p>In the Post:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001799.html">Brunell&#8217;s struggles</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001864.html">Seahawk shake up</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001856.html">The Froster</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011000965.html">Taylor trial delay</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001635.html">Springs return</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001800.html">Dilfer routing for Hawks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/10/divisional-playoff-preview-redskins-defense-vs-seahawks-offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 2 Preview: Looking Back at Week 4</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/09/round-2-preview-looking-back-at-week-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/09/round-2-preview-looking-back-at-week-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[â€œSure the Redskins won, but only because the Seahawks kicker missed that field goal in the 4th quarterâ€ Get used to hearing that, because it will be said over and over again this week. And yes its true. Of course [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://images.nfl.com/u/photos/pl_163268.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://images.nfl.com/u/photos/pl_163268.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>â€œSure the Redskins won, but only because the Seahawks kicker missed that field goal in the 4th quarterâ€</p>
<p>Get used to hearing that, because it will be said over and over again this week. And yes its true. Of course that means discounting the other 59 minutes of the game and assuming nothing else happened that may have changed the score.</p>
<p>Josh Brown was one for three on his field goal attempts in the game. For a kicker who kicked at 72% of the season, thatâ€™s a bad day. However, all of his kicks were from long distance. He made a 53 yarder, and missed twice from 47, not exactly chip shots. By comparison, the Redskin kicker at the time, Nick Novak, was 2 for 3. His miss was a 33-yard kick that was blocked and he hit from 40 and 39 yards.</p>
<p>When looking at the match-ups, Seattle has the better offense, while the Redskins are better on defense. Containing Seattle is the key for the Redskins. In the week 4 contest this was accomplished not by a good defensive showing, in fact the defense was fairly lackluster, but by the offense controlling the ball. Take a look at the Redskins drive chart for the 1st half of the game:<br />
<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6198/1756/1600/skins%20hawks%20drive%20chart.0.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6198/1756/320/skins%20hawks%20drive%20chart.0.jpg" /></a>The Redskins had three time consuming drives. The Redskins controlled the ball for 22 minutes in the 1st half and dominated the half. The Redskins couldnâ€™t cash in, and only lead 7-3 at the half. Part of this is due to Nick Novak, and his tendency to kick right into the defensive line and part of it is due to the Redskins not cashing in when in the red zone.</p>
<p>With John Hall back from injury, another field goal block by the Seahawks would be a surprise. Also the Redskins offense has matured to the point where they are now one of the best red zone offenses in the league. That said, with Portis banged up it will be tough to control the clock in this weekâ€™s encounter.</p>
<p>You can be sure Gibbs and company will be looking over the game tape and preparing an offensive game plan revolving around time of possession. Mark Brunell needs to turn get back to mid season form and convert those 3rd and shorts. If the Redskins dominate time of possession like they did in week 4, expect the season to continue for yet another week.</p>
<p>Today in the Post:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/09/AR2006010902001.html">Wilbon on Taylor, Vick</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/09/AR2006010900949.html">Taylor fined</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/09/AR2006010901780.html">Focus on Offense</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/09/AR2006010902004.html">Media Crunch</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/09/AR2006010901778.html">Evans steps in</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/09/AR2006010901723.html">Alexander dominates</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/09/AR2006010901651.html">Seattle&#8217;s homefield advantage</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/09/AR2006010901781.html">Rhodes in Charge</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/09/round-2-preview-looking-back-at-week-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still Alive and Kicking</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/07/still-alive-and-kicking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/07/still-alive-and-kicking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a stressful game. It was a typical ugly road game for the Redskins. But a win is a win and the season continues another week. Thatâ€™s a good thing, no matter which way you slice it. The offense was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/TPS10201072222.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/TPS10201072222.jpg" /></a>What a stressful game.  It was a typical ugly road game for the Redskins.  But a win is a win and the season continues another week.  Thatâ€™s a good thing, no matter which way you slice it.</p>
<p>The offense was horrible, but keep in mind Brunell only had 15 pass attempts and Portis was clearly hurting.  Improvement is obviously needed but keep the disappointment in check.  Special Teams were pretty good.  I was ready to name Derrick Frost as the game MVP up until that horribly timed shank late in the 4th quarter.  John Hall made his kick, and the coverage units did alright.</p>
<p>As for the defense, what can you say?  They were tremendous all day.  Yes, the Bucs missed a few shots late, but donâ€™t forget the Redskins missed a few early shots (the Portis pass and the fake screen deep ball to Moss).  Both touchdowns should be credited towards the defense even though they only scored the one.  You canâ€™t credit the offense for a five yard touchdown drive.  Good on Arrington for getting that pick, and you canâ€™t say enough about the defensive line.  They shut down the run, and they batted back more than a few balls.</p>
<p>Yes, it was an ugly win.  But think back to week 10 and that pretty loss to Tampa Bay.  Iâ€™ll take this one any day.  So enjoy this one for a few days, and come Monday we can prepare for the Seahawks.</p>
<p>Hail to the Redskins!</p>
<p>Whole lotta articles to read:<br />
Washington Post<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701283.html">Front Page</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701236.html">Wilbon</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701208.html">Kornheiser</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010700751.html">Soloman</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701215.html">Notebook</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010700880.html">Taylor Tossed</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701504.html">TBays Missed Chance</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701494.html">Offense sucks</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701487.html">Skins get breaks</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701387.html">DC fans enjoy game</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701196.html">Seattle is next</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010700671.html">Recap</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701520.html">Wise on Arrington</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/07/still-alive-and-kicking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Weeks Victim: The Tampa Bay Buccaneers</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/07/this-weeks-victim-the-tampa-bay-buccaneers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/07/this-weeks-victim-the-tampa-bay-buccaneers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since my weekly list of why the Redskins will win is solely responsible for team going on this tear of late, I must continue it. So without further ado, hereâ€™s why the Redskins beat the Buccaneers today: The Bucs canâ€™t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since my weekly list of why the Redskins will win is solely responsible for team going on this tear of late, I must continue it.  So without further ado, hereâ€™s why the Redskins beat the Buccaneers today:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Bucs canâ€™t stop runs to the right.  The Redskins are at their best running to the right.  Oh and they also lead the league in most run attempts to the right (21% of all run plays)</li>
<li>The Redskins were negative two in turnovers in the last game and lost by one point.  At that point in the season the Redskins were about -10 in turnovers, since that game they have moved all the way up to plus 1.</li>
<li>Did you read Boswell in Fridayâ€™s Washington Post?  Gibbs coached teams have improved by 17 points over teams they lost to previously.  And donâ€™t think this trend hasnâ€™t continued in Gibbsâ€™ second tenure:</li>
</ul>
<div align="center">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Opponent</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Gm1 </strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Gm2</strong></td>
<td valign="top" style="width: 98px"><strong>Improvement </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Cowboys â€˜04</td>
<td valign="top">-3</td>
<td valign="top">-3</td>
<td valign="top" style="width: 98px">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Giants â€˜04</td>
<td valign="top">-6</td>
<td valign="top">24</td>
<td valign="top" style="width: 98px">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Eagles â€˜04</td>
<td valign="top">-22</td>
<td valign="top">-3</td>
<td valign="top" style="width: 98px">19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Cowboys â€˜05</td>
<td valign="top">1</td>
<td valign="top">28</td>
<td valign="top" style="width: 98px">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Giants â€˜05</td>
<td valign="top">-36</td>
<td valign="top">15</td>
<td valign="top" style="width: 98px">51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Eagles â€˜05</td>
<td valign="top">7</td>
<td valign="top">11</td>
<td valign="top" style="width: 98px">4</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<ul>
<li>Do you really think Gregg Williams is going let a young quarterback like Chris Simms rip him twice?</li>
<li>Portis has played against Tampa Bay twice since moving to Washington: 2004 â€“ 148 yards; 2005 -144 yards.</li>
<li>Any team that thinks having a pirate ship in one end zone is cool deserves to lose.</li>
<li>Joe Gibbs has never lost in the wild card round.</li>
<li>Despite all the media hype of this great rebuild by Jon Gruden, every top defensive player on the Buccaneers is getting old.</li>
<li>Tampa Bay lost to San Francisco and the Jets for god sakes.</li>
</ul>
<p>Itâ€™s the playoffs baby, enjoy the game today.</p>
<p>Saturday in the Washington Post:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/06/AR2006010602033.html">Long Article on Cooley</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/06/AR2006010601879.html">Wilbon likes the Seahawks</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/06/AR2006010601789.html">The U comes through</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/06/AR2006010601931.html">Springs still questionable</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/07/this-weeks-victim-the-tampa-bay-buccaneers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wild Card Preview: Special Teams and NFL Picks</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/06/wild-card-preview-special-teams-and-nfl-picks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/06/wild-card-preview-special-teams-and-nfl-picks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here for Part One of this Preview Click here for Part Two of this Preview When looking back at the Redskins season, perhaps the most important play came on special teams. With the Skins struggling in Arizona, Antonio Brown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://theredskinreport.blogspot.com/2006/01/wild-card-preview-redskins-defense-vs.html">Click here for Part One of this Preview</a><br />
<a href="http://theredskinreport.blogspot.com/2006/01/wild-card-preview-redskins-offense-vs.html">Click here for Part Two of this Preview</a></p>
<p>When looking back at the Redskins season, perhaps the most important play came on special teams.  With the Skins struggling in Arizona, Antonio Brown took a kickoff back for a touchdown.   The touchdown gave the Redskins a lead, and helped propel the team into the playoffs.  Even in the earlier Tampa Bay game, the Redskins special teams bailed them out of a big hole when Ladell Betts had kickoff return touchback.</p>
<p>Redskins Special Teams<br />
K: John Hall 12-14 85.7%<br />
P: Derrick Frost 40.4 Avg., 36.7 Net,<br />
PR: Antonio Brown 13-63, 4.8 avg.<br />
KR: Ladell Betts 24-621, 25.9 avg., 1 TD<br />
Antonio Brown 19-439, 23.1 avg., 1 TD<br />
Kickoff Coverage: 72-1503, 20.9 avg., 0 TD, 6th in league<br />
Punt Coverage: 40-189, 4.7 avg., 0 TD, 2nd in league</p>
<p>Joe Gibbs has always put a focus on special teams.  And the Redskinsâ€™ special teams, which not long ago were a terrible unit, are now a strong part of the club.  They are led by the kickoff return team.  Both Ladell Betts and Antonio Brown had return touchdowns.  Iâ€™d expect Betts to get the call this week as he previously had success against Tampa Bay and is more consistent on his returns.  Brown will handle the punt return duties.  He has yet to break one since his return, but with his speed, it could happen at any time.   Kicker John Hall hasnâ€™t been needed much, but has done well when called upon.  His kickoffs are a bit below average.  Punter Derrick Frost has improved as the season has gone on, but he does have some shanks punts every now and again.</p>
<p>Tampa Bay Special Teams<br />
K: Matt Bryant 21-25 84%<br />
P: Josh Bidwell 45.6 Avg., 37.5 Net,<br />
PR: Mark Jones 15-492, 9.6 avg.<br />
KR: Torrie Cox 24-464, 19.3 avg., 0 TD<br />
Edell Shepherd 20-414, 20.7 avg., 0 TD<br />
Kickoff Coverage: 63-1368, 21.7 avg., 1 TD, 17th in league<br />
Punt Coverage: 49-466, 9.5 avg., 0 TD, 25th in league</p>
<p>As you can see, the Tampa coverage units have struggled this season.  Josh Bidwell has a big leg, but it leads to returns as he can out kick the coverage.  I wouldnâ€™t be surprised if Gibbs had Santana Moss try a return or two in this game.  Matt Bryant had a good year, although oddly 2 of his missed came on 20-29 yard field goals.  Mark Jones has good numbers returning punts, but the kick returners are below average.   There is the opportunity for a big return or two in this game for the Redskins.</p>
<p><strong>Game Pick</strong>:</p>
<p>When you boil down everything, the Redskins are the better team.  They played a much tougher schedule, and are a stronger team.  They have more big play threats in all aspects of the game.  That said this isnâ€™t a slam dunk victory.  The Skins have been much better at home than when playing on the road.  Simeon Rice has wreaked havoc on the Redskins in the past and if he dominates the battle with Chris Samuels, the Skins could be in trouble.  They need a good game from Mark Brunell as well.  The Brunell of last week against the Eagles wonâ€™t cut it.   Interestingly, neither Joe Gibbs nor Jon Gruden has lost a wild card game as coaches.  That said, Gibbs career is much longer and the Skins are rolling into the playoffs.  Itâ€™ll be close, but Iâ€™m taking the Skins.</p>
<p>Washington 20 Tampa Bay 13 (Tampa is favored by 2.5)</p>
<p><strong>Other Picks</strong><br />
New England 24 Jacksonville 20 (NE favored by 7.5) (Best Bet)<br />
Carolina 20 NY Giants 17 (Giants favored by 2.5)<br />
Pittsburgh 28 Cincinnati 24 (Steelers favored by 3)</p>
<p>In the Post on Friday:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/05/AR2006010502178.html">Skins run is vintage Gibbs</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/05/AR2006010502293.html">Gibbs is at his best in the playoffs</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/05/AR2006010502335_2.html">Blache gets the line rolling</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/05/AR2006010501896.html">Bucs aim to stop Portis</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content//article/2006/01/05/AR2006010501939.html">Wilbon on Vince Young: Go the NFL</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/06/wild-card-preview-special-teams-and-nfl-picks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wild Card Preview: Redskins Offense vs Buccaneers Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/05/wild-card-preview-redskins-offense-vs-buccaneers-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/05/wild-card-preview-redskins-offense-vs-buccaneers-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibbons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2005-06 Season Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theredskinreport.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest turnaround for the Redskins this season has been on the offensive side of the ball. They went from a terrible offense to an above average offense, which is what moved a 6-10 team to 10-6. They finished as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest turnaround for the Redskins this season has been on the offensive side of the ball.  They went from a terrible offense to an above average offense, which is what moved a 6-10 team to 10-6.   They finished as the 11th best offense in the NFL.  While they can be inconsistent, the improvement has been remarkable.  Much has been made of the Redskins relying on certain players and not spreading the ball around, but teams have had trouble shutting the big weapons down.  In the previous meeting, the Redskin offense scored 35 points and played well enough to win, unfortunately the defense let them down.<strong /></p>
<p><strong>Expected Starters<br />
</strong><u>Washington Offense<br />
</u>QB: Mark Brunell<br />
RB: Clinton Portis<br />
HB: Chris Cooley<br />
WR: Santana Moss<br />
WR: James Thrash<br />
TE: Robert Royal<br />
OL: C. Samuels, D. Dockery, C. Rabach, R. Brown, J. Jansen<u /></p>
<p><u>Tampa Bay Defense</u><br />
DE: Greg Spires<br />
DT: Chris Hovan<br />
DT: Anthony McFarland<br />
DE: Simeon Rice<br />
LOLB: D. Brooks<br />
MLB: Sheldon Quarles<br />
ROLB: Ryan Nece<br />
LCB: Brian Kelly<br />
RCB: Ronde Barber<br />
SS: Jermaine Phillips<br />
FS: Dexter Jackson</p>
<p><strong>Passing Game:</strong><em><br />
Washington</em>:<br />
Mark Brunell 262-454, 57.7%, 23 TD, 10 INT<br />
Santana Moss 84-1483, 9 TD<br />
Chris Cooley 71-774, 7 TD</p>
<p>For a set of guys who had various levels of criticism over the years, Brunell, Moss and Cooley all had great years.  Brunell, who was widely regarded as finished, rebounded from a terrible season to produce good numbers.  He set a career high in touchdown throws this season, and throws a very good deep ball.  One concern with Brunell is a knee sprain, which limited him in the season finale.  Brunell is no longer the running threat he was in his younger years, but he still can take off and get a key first down if the opportunity presents itself.</p>
<p>Moss and Cooley combined to haul in 55.8% of the Redskins receptions this season.  Moss emerged as a true number one receiver in his 1st season in Washington.  He set career highs in catches and yards.  Moss has the ability to turn any play into a big gainer with his speed and quick moves.  He also excels at adjusting to the deep ball and had an astonishing 10 catches of 40 yards or more.  Cooley, in his 2nd year, established himself amongst the best at his position.  He had great hands and is decent running after the catch.  The Redskins look for him a lot on roll out passes.</p>
<p>The other targets arenâ€™t used as much, but can have an impact on the game.  James Thrash has started to make a few plays after returning from a hamstring injury.  Clinton Portis is good receiver out of the backfield, although he gets limited opportunities.  Robert Royal is usually called upon to make one or two catches a game; although drops can hinder him.  The Redskins passing attack ranks21st in the league, although schedule adjustments move them way up to 10th.  It was a hard schedule this year, no way around it.</p>
<p><em>Tampa Bay:</em><br />
Simeon Rice 14 sacks, 1 interception<br />
Ronde Barber 2 sacks, 5 interceptions<br />
Brian Kelly 1 sack, 4 interceptions</p>
<p>The NFL stats will show that the Buccaneers finished 6th in the NFL in pass defense and 6th against the run.   However after schedule adjustments they prove to be much tougher against the run than the pass.  They drop to 15th in the NFL in pass defense after making the adjustment.  Simeon Rice is a dominating pass rusher.  His 14 sacks rank 3rd in the NFL and this season marked the 5th straight year heâ€™s hit double figures in sacks.  The assignment of blocking him falls to Chris Samuels.  The entire game may fall down to this match-up.  If you look back over the recent games between Tampa and Washington, whichever player has won the battle, their team has won the game.   Besides Rice, the pass rush comes from blitzing, with no other player over 3 sacks on the season.</p>
<p>The secondary is good, but not without its flaws.  Ronde Barber is the star of the group.  Heâ€™s a very physical corner.  You would expect him to line up opposite Santana Moss most of the game, however much like the Redskins, the Bucs usually leave their corners on one side of the field.  Tampa also plays a zone; so donâ€™t look for many one on one situations.  Brian Kelly, the other corner, is a decent corner but is beaten a fair bit.  The safeties are good but not great.  In the earlier game, Tampa got 2 picks, one from Rice and one from nickel corner Juran Bolden<em /></p>
<p><em>Buccaneers Pass Defense by the Numbers</em>:<br />
Vs Number 1 Receivers: Ranked 7th<br />
Vs Number 2 Receivers: Ranked 14th<br />
Vs Other Receivers: Ranked 30th<br />
Vs Tight Ends: Ranked 13th<br />
Vs Running Backs: Ranked 18th<br />
<strong><br />
Run Game</strong><em><br />
Washington:<br />
</em>Clinton Portis 352-1516, 4.3ypc, 11 TD<br />
Ladell Betts 89-338, 3.8ypc, 1 TD<br />
Rock Cartwright 27-199, 7.4, 2 TD</p>
<p>Suddenly there is no talk about Portis being a system back.  Portis is now established as one of the best backs in the league.  Heâ€™s become a very tough runner, but he can also break off the long one.  Portis is also a very good pass blocker and receiver.  In two games since joining the Redskins, Portis has rushed for 144 and 148 against the Buccaneers.  Ladell Betts is a solid back up.  Much like Pittman for Tampa Bay he hits the hole very hard.  Like Portis he is a decent receiver out of the backfield.  Rock Cartwright isnâ€™t used often in the backfield, but has proven to be effective when used.  The Redskins rate as the 7th best rushing attack in the NFL and are 9th after schedule adjustments.</p>
<p><em>Washington Run Game by the Numbers (as of Week 16):</em><br />
Runs around Left End: 4.49ypc (11th)<br />
Runs behind Left Tackle: 4.27ypc (18th)<br />
Runs up the Middle: 4.29ypc (10th)<br />
Runs behind the Right Tackle: 3.96ypc (22nd)<br />
Runs around Right End: 5.08ypc (3rd)</p>
<p><em>Tampa Bay:</em><br />
Shelton Quarles: 129 tackles, 4 forced fumbles<br />
Derrick Brooks: 125 tackles, 1 forced fumble<br />
Ronde Barber: 99 tackles</p>
<p>Tampa has a good run defense.  Derrick Brooks and Quarles are strong, quick linebackers who make lots of tackles.  Ronde Barber is among the best run support cornerbacks in the league.  As mentioned above, the Redskins have had plenty of success running the ball against Tampa Bay.  Ryan Nece is the weakest link in regular 4-3 defensive set.  Also note that the Redskins have good success at running to the right, while Tampa Bay struggles at covering that side.<br />
<em><br />
Buccaneers Run Defense by the Numbers (as of Week 16):</em><br />
Runs around Left End: 2.86ypc (4th)<br />
Runs behind Left Tackle: 4.56ypc (25th)<br />
Runs up the Middle: 3.36ypc (2nd)<br />
Runs behind Right Tackle: 3.82ypc (10th)<br />
Runs around Right End: 4.88 (25th)<br />
<strong><br />
Summary</strong><br />
The battle between the Redskinsâ€™ offensive line and Tampaâ€™s defense will be a dogfight.  Both teams pride themselves on being physical and they should bring it all day.  A gimpy Brunell could spell trouble for the Skins as the Bucs are a quick defense.  Rice vs. Samuels is the key match-up in the game.  If Rice dominates, the Redskins offense will struggle.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I expect the running game to hold to form.  Theyâ€™ve had success against Tampa Bay in the past, and there is no reason to expect that to change.   Iâ€™d look for the Redskins to dominate in time of possession and wear out the Tampa defense.  It will be a good battle and fun to watch either way.<em /></p>
<p><em>Tomorrow: Special Teams, Intangibles and Game Picks</em></p>
<p><em>In the Post:</em><br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/04/AR2006010402244.html">Brunell battles</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/04/AR2006010402245.html">Tampa GM bio</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/04/AR2006010402226.html">Cadillac rolls</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/04/AR2006010402208.html">Griffin eager to meet Bucs</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/04/AR2006010400857.html">Skins-Bucs Rivalry</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theredskinreport.com/2006/01/05/wild-card-preview-redskins-offense-vs-buccaneers-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

